Caiaphas - Wikipedia
Jesus is led to Annas, then to High Priest Caiaphas. The Sanhedrin holds Annas questions Jesus “about his disciples and about his teaching.” Jesus replies. Bible Trivia Questions. Subscribe to our newsletter to download your free Bible Trivia Questions eBook and to receive notification of new resources.  Concerning the relationship between Annas and Caiaphas, the Gospel of John . and would yet cause, significant problems in the eyes of the Romans.
Is this actually a prophecy of the imminent atoning sacrifice of the Savior? If so, how could a wicked man such as Caiaphas utter such a prophecy?
What is the account of Annas and Caiaphas?
Or is there another way to understand this expression? John also offers an explanation how Caiaphas, a wicked man, was able to utter these prophetic words about Jesus, implying that Caiaphas did not actually speak these words of his own volition: The Jewish historian Josephus mentions traditions that say the high priest acquired the gift of prophecy simply by virtue of his position in the priesthood.
It is important to point out that this last statement—applying the death of Jesus not only to the Jews, but to other nations—is an editorial comment and not the words of Caiaphas himself.
But Christians like John can, in hindsight, look at the statement and detect further meaning that applies to the Atonement.
JESUS and the High Priest ANNAS
What then did Caiaphas intend? A riot might cause the Romans to shut down the temple, which could negatively affect Jews all across the Roman Empire. Further, because Caiaphas was the high priest, the loss of the temple—a very profitable enterprise because of the constant receipt of tithes and offerings—would have been financially devastating to him and many other members of the Sadducee-dominated Sanhedrin.
The sons of Lehi had peacefully sought to obtain the brass plates and even offered to generously pay Laban for them see 1 Nephi 4: But rather than discussing the issue with Laman, Laban responded in anger, accusing Laman of robbery and threatening to kill him see 1 Nephi 4: When the sons of Lehi presented to him riches in exchange for the brass plates, Laban ordered his servants to kill them so that Laban might have their property see 1 Nephi 4: Because Laban had rejected multiple attempts by the sons of Lehi to peacefully negotiate for possession of the brass plates and also because he sought to kill them, the Lord gave a commandment to Nephi justifying his actions against Laban.
The Spirit clearly declared to Nephi: Nephi understood that his family and his descendants would need the brass plates that they might keep the ordinances and sacrifices contained in the law of Moses see 1 Nephi 15— The words of Caiaphas, on the other hand, had little to do with righteous desires.
Don Stewart :: Who Were the High Priest's Annas and Caiaphas?
He may have unwittingly said things about the Savior that had deeper meaning in Christian hindsight. Israel Exploration Society,— For a convenient English translation, see Paul L.
Domeris and Simon M. For convenience, I will simply refer to the narrator as John.
The Desire of Ages/Before Annas and the Court of Caiaphas
On the complexity of the authorship of the Gospel of John, see Frank F. Jackson and Frank F. Deseret Book,— After Moses broke the first set of tablets, which contained the fullness of the gospel, the Lord declared to Moses: David Noel Friedman New York: Doubleday,4: HarperSanFrancisco,— VanderKam, From Joshua to Caiaphas: High Priests after the Exile Minneapolis: Fortress,— By the time of the Savior, the Sadducees dominated the Sanhedrin, although there were a few Pharisees in the council.
See, for example, Nicodemus in John 3: Josephus mentions that the Sanhedrin consisted of seventy-one members see Josephus, Jewish War 2. Bookcraft, For references to this tradition, see George R. Beasley-Murray, John, 2nd ed. Word Books,—90; F. Jewish Publication Society, —665: Concerning the significance of the four days, Elder Russell M. A portion of that significance was that, according to some Jewish traditions, it took four days before the Spirit finally and irrevocably departed from the body of the deceased person, so that decomposition could then proceed.
The Master, in order to demonstrate His total power over death and His control over life, knowingly waited until that four-day interval had elapsed. Then He raised Lazarus from the dead! President Ezra Taft Benson also taught: It was also a superstition among them that the spirit lingered around the body for three days, but on the fourth day, it departed.
Jesus was very familiar with their beliefs.
He therefore delayed His arrival in Bethany until Lazarus had been in the grave for four days. Jesus Christ was the first person to be resurrected. New Testament[ edit ] "Christ before Caiaphas".
The comparatively long eighteen-year tenure of Caiaphas suggests he had a good working relationship with the Roman authorities. They worry that if they "let him go on like this, everyone will believe in him, and the Romans will come and destroy both our holy place and our nation. Caiaphas makes a political calculation, suggesting that it would be better for "one man" Jesus to die than for "the whole nation" to be destroyed. In this Caiaphas is stating a rabbinic quotation Gen.
- Interpreting Caiaphas's "Prophecy" of the Savior's Death
Pilate tells the priests to judge Jesus themselves, to which they respond they lack authority to do so. Pilate questions Jesus, after which he states, "I find no basis for a charge against him.
Sanhedrin trial of Jesus In the Gospel of Matthew They are looking for false evidence with which to frame Jesus, but are unable to find any.
Jesus remains silent throughout the proceedings until Caiaphas demands that Jesus say whether he is the Christ. Jesus replies "I am: Political implications[ edit ] Caiaphas was the son-in-law of Annas by marriage to his daughter and ruled longer than any high priest in New Testament times. For Jewish leaders of the time, there were serious concerns about Roman rule and an insurgent Zealot movement to eject the Romans from Israel. The Romans would not perform execution over violations of Halakhaand therefore the charge of blasphemy would not have mattered to Pilate.