[spoiler MAIN] Why does Melisandre think Stannis is AA reborn : asoiaf
Melisandre's simplistic, Manichean views perfectly suit Stannis, so it's an actual marriage (as Ned tries to tell Robert, and Robert doesn't care to listen). happened if Ned took Renly's advice and then revealed to Renly. Stannis respectfully (in his own way) listens Jons advice in many . of Stannis personality (his bluntness, Melisandre's influence on him etc). Like Fitz Grant on Scandal, Stannis desires power, but lacks the very skills needed to be a true leader. He gives into Melisandre and burns the girl alive. Stannis is trapped in a loveless marriage with Selyse Baratheon. Her advice led to his defeat during "The Battle of the Blackwater" and as of last.
Theirs may be a rare example of young love that could work in Westeros — that is if the world of Game of Thrones allows them to ever get to that point, before the series ends forever. For some reason, the series felt it necessary to even feature scenes suggestive of their consummation of their relationship, despite the disturbing age implications.
Even worse, as Tommen found himself swayed by the cult of the Sparrows, Margaery soon found herself banished to prison, proving that all she had achieved in the name of social climbing was utterly pointless. Grey Worm and Missandei The Unsullied as a group are rarely ever given a voice, let alone an interior life of their own.
With the character of Grey Worm, however, the series does offer an inside look at the emotional world of these men — no matter how little verbal communication he uses. Their scenes rank among the most tender love scenes that the series has provided so far, as the chemistry between he characters and their actors is entirely believable and effortless. Joffrey Baratheon and Sansa Stark Poor Sansa Stark may have picked the worst possible person in the world to have her first crush on.
The destructive relationship plays a large part in the untimely demise of her own father, Ned, as well, which leaves Sansa with plenty of trauma to deal with and no real source of solace.
So when their relationship finally comes to an end, it is with great relief on the part of all viewers, and Sansa herself. However, the damage has already long been done.
When he fell in love with Gilly, a long-abused daughter of Craster, it was clear that this was what he felt could be his moment of heroism.
Despite how little viewers actually were treated to of it, the marriage between Ned Stark and Catelyn Tully was portrayed entirely as a partnership of equals. Through their unhealthy union, three children were born — with a fourth potentially on the way — including the tyrannical King Joffrey and the utterly incompetent and overpowered King Tommen.
Their union has done nothing but lead to destruction, whether of their family or of their kingdom. Certain scenes in particular have also been doubly problematic, with implications of assault stirring up many a debate on the internet.
Thankfully, season 7 ends with Jaime seeming to come to his senses as he abandons his sister and sets off to chart his own course.
The furor online among fans of both the television series and the book series was seemingly never-ending when the offending episode aired. There was truly no point to including the scene, or the plot entirely, in as graphic detail as it was written and portrayed. Ramsay was already a truly psychotic, unpredictable, violent threat long before he assaulted and repeatedly abused Sansa. Subjecting her character to this incessant abuse did nothing for the series as a whole.
If this theory does turn out to be the case, it shows Stannis as exhibiting early hallmarks of being an enlightenment thinker, placing the king under law. When the stormlander and some Reacher lords swore fealty to Stannis, he was well within both his rights and his view of treason to execute them.
Instead, he pardoned them. However, he goes a step further in saying that he forgave their treachery, which goes beyond the political and military reality and lands squarely on a flexible sense of ethics. But Stannis did something that required him to forgo rigidity: But the fact remained to Stannis: This was something that Stannis came to recognize over the course of the books. The biggest stumbling block to winning more swords was the issue of religion.
Were they treated unequally? Davos Seaworth was elevated to Handship, despite his renewed adherence to the Faith of the Seven. In this, we find a strongly tolerant vision of faiths. Stannis was convinced that the Lord of Light was the one true God, but he was unwilling to force his belief on others. He promoted adherents of any religion who proved themselves useful, such as Davos, and demoted those who proved useless, such as Alester Florent.
Everything you need to know about Melisandre, Game of Thrones’ Red Priestess
And this religious toleration as a means of policy also extended to the old gods of the north. Stannis could have attempted to force a new religion on the northmen, but he resisted that impulse in two key ways. First, he decided to leave Melisandre at Castle Black instead of taking her on campaign with him in the north. Still, his political astuteness in dealing delicately with the faiths of his would-be subjects is yet another example of his adaptability and inventiveness — the exact opposite qualities of mindless rigidity.
It is time we made alliance against our common foe. And to be fair to this viewpoint, he does himself no favors through his brusque speech and demeanor. However, when examined closely, he shows a less-than-iron-willed approach to diplomacy. In A Clash of Kings and early in A Storm of Swords, his approach to diplomacy is one where he demands fealty in exchange for pardons.
When Renly died, Stannis sent envoys to the Tyrells demanding their fealty in exchange for clemency for their treason. Following the death of Robb Stark and Balon Greyjoy, Stannis grudgingly decided to offer pardons to the Iron Islands and the north in exchange for their loyalty.
The lions will devour them unless… Saan, I will require your fastest ships to carry envoys to the Iron islands and White Harbor. I shall offer pardons. However, by the end of that novel, we start to see his thinking evolving considerably though not fully. Jon Snow was the confirmed bastard son of Eddard Stark, and, as a bastard, he could not inherit Winterfell without a royal legitimization.
But Stannis desired a unifying source for his attempts to marshal the north, and Jon became the manifestation of that desire. As it turns out, this would not be the last time that he showed a diplomatic flexibility. When Stannis first attempts to recruit the northern lords in his cause by sending out murders of ravens, he was almost uniformly rejected; the Karstarks duplicitously declared for Stannis, but a number of houses, such as the Mormonts, declared they would never swear fealty to anyone whose name was not Stark, and scores more never even responded.
Homage might have been owed to Stannis by these houses and their lords, but his old approach of demanding their loyalty did not amend itself to receiving the pledges of fealty he desperately needed to win in the north. Fortunately for Stannis, however, he still had Jon Snow. Lord Snow counseled Stannis to refrain from demanding fealty and instead offered a different idea for securing their loyalty: Your Grace will need to go to them yourself. The clans have not seen a king since Torrhen Stark bent his knee.
Your coming does them honor. He is no king of mine. Instead of begging or demanding, asking for help made it more possible for Stannis to win allies. And win them he did, as we find northern clansmen attacking the ironborn at Deepwood Motte at his side. An important distinction to make here is that most of the northern houses and clans are fighting with Stannis not on behalf of his claim to the Iron Throne, but, rather, to rescue Arya Stark.
The king has to be aware of this, and it has to grate on his pride considerably, but he nonetheless allows these men into his ranks and considers them some of his best soldiers in the north, giving them prestigious positions within his army. Comparing Stannis to His Rivals: I had the cart before the horse. I was trying to win the throne to save the kingdom, when I should have been trying to save the kingdom to win the throne. How does his pragmatism and adaptability match up against other claimants to the throne, and, more importantly, does it make him a better contender for the crown?
Renly Baratheon Stannis is most often compared and contrasted with his brother, Renly — not only by readers, but also by Stannis himself. Renly was easygoing; Stannis is not.
Renly made friends easily; Stannis declared that kings have no friends, only subjects and enemies. In the parlay between the two from A Clash of Kings, we see two very different views of kingship. Renly knew that Stannis had claim via royal inheritance, but he believed that the swords sworn to him gave him the right to be king.
This underlies his flexible morality — which just may be flexible to the point of seeming amoral — which is on display time and again in the series: In this, he was doubly usurping the throne, both from Joffrey and from his brother. Instead, he investigated whether Joffrey, Myrcella, and Tommen were, indeed, bastards. This is the key to understanding the difference between the two brothers: Renly would usurp the throne because he thought he would make a good king and nothing else.
Stannis would not make a claim unless he had evidence that would support it. Though Stannis called him a traitor and rebel, he and Robb possessed some key similarities — but also one fundamental difference. In this, Robb had the horse before the cart — he saved the soon-to-be kingdom first before gaining the crown. In defeating Mance Rayder and the wildlings at Castle Black and then campaigning against both the ironmen at Deepwood Motte and the Boltons and Freys at Winterfell, Stannis was demonstrating value in defending the realm, and thereby demonstrating his value as a king, as well.
However, Robb Stark actually shows himself to be much more morally inflexible than Stannis. When Robb bedded Jeyne Westerling, he refused to simply dishonor her and move on; he married her instead, and, thus, started the sequence of events that brought his reign to a crashing, horrifying conclusion.
Everything you need to know about Melisandre, Game of Thrones’ Red Priestess
And Stannis did flinch from the implication that he was guilty of murder, giving a particularly poor alibi when questioned by Davos. However, his betrayal of his marriage vows — as well as the consequence of this betrayal — did not turn him aside from pursuing his claim to the Iron Throne. Daenerys Targaryen At the end of the War of the Five Kings, Stannis stood alone as the last living king of the original contenders.
Despite this minor victory, however, George R. Martin seems to be setting the stage for a confrontation between Stannis and another figure that he almost certainly does not know is coming to Westeros: The last Targaryen has been openly stating that the Iron Throne is hers by right. Their contrasting views of justice provide even further illumination. While Stannis does believe that justice involves repaying injustice with punishment, he attempts to restore social order and execute justice without regard to his own personal feelings.
At the same time, Stannis rewarded Davos with a knighthood for this good act. In this, Stannis shows a fairness and flexibility in rewarding and punishing good and bad acts respectively. She shows a flexibility in dealing with the Meereenese and attempts peace through a distasteful marriage. She comes to believe that dragons plant no trees, and she is taking this to mean that only fire and blood are her recourses — a mentality that will no doubt be brought to Westeros.
I doubt that her sudden reappearance will present another hard choosing for him; he will continue to press his claim by demonstrating actual value and simultaneously oppose the queen who will bring only vengeance, fire, and blood to Westeros instead of restoring justice. Here, we find Stannis and his army waiting for the Boltons and Freys to attack him near Winterfell. Freezing and near-starvation, they remained loyal to Stannis and ready to die for the would-be southron king in the battle to come — with the sole exception of the Karstarks, of course, whose disloyalty was quickly discovered and dealt with.
Is this the work of a king who would break before bending? Stannis Baratheon is and always will be a controversial character in the world of A Song of Ice and Fire and the fandom. He is the recipient of legitimate criticism over many of his actions, but the interpretation of him as hard, unyielding, and inflexible is unjust.
Donal Noye died fighting against the wildling invasion before Stannis could arrive at the Wall, but I wonder how he would have viewed the king had he survived. Would he still hold to the view that Stannis was iron? Or would he have a more positive appraisal? I think the latter.