The Character of Physical Law by Richard Feynman
The unreasonable relationship between mathematics and physics mathematics expresses something deep about the nature of physical reality. . of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a. This book interprets the book of nature for curious readers of all sorts, but especially for those looking to appreciate the power and beauty of physics without having to grapple with the mathematics. Hundreds of little 2 Ties That Bind. Richard Feynman's The Character of Physical Law – published in the relationship between physics and mathematics, the role of symmetry in.
To describe this bending Einstein needed to define the curvature of a geometric object without reference to a surrounding space the object is embedded in — and this is exactly what Riemann had done before him. See here to find out more about Riemann's notion of curvature.
This is just one example of the unintended usefulness of mathematics. Purely mathematical considerations continue to lead the way in modern physics, and they continue to prove impressively productive see here to find out more. Simplicity Once a mathematical description of a physical theory has been found, it is often surprisingly simple. This doesn't mean that the maths of physics is easy — far from it.
The unreasonable relationship between mathematics and physics | zolyblog.info
It means that advances in physics don't come with ever more convoluted mathematics. Breakthroughs in physics happen when someone finds a new way of looking at a problem; a way that requires a mathematical framework that previously hadn't been considered for the purpose, or is completely new. Every single time such a new framework has been deployed in the history of physics, the simplest equation within it turned out to be the one that describes what is happening in our Universe.
Einstein's general theory of relativity is again a case in point. Its central equation is given below.
Even if you don't understand what its symbols mean, you have to admit that for a description of all large-scale structures and processes in the Universe, it's elegantly brief. If you would like to understand the equation in more detail, see this article. Precision Another thing that sets the mathematics of physics apart from maths as applied in other sciences is its incredible precision.Feynman's Lectures on Physics - Symmetry in Physical Law
As one example of many, consider a number called the factor, which serves to describe how the spin of an electron responds to an electromagnetic field.
We can not get into the spiritual realm Thank God so we have no control over the laws. Distance was also present but nothing solid to measure between. The laws of Truth are eternal, the laws are God. There was gravityenergy ,…all these phenomenon were behaving to some point inside this universe of ours…. We dig deeper and found only a couple of explanations that are not complete and we until now continue to be doubtful even on the latest explanation we know.
If we questionhow these behaviours come to beI dont knowbut what I do know that it was not a results of a mathematician or physicist thinking. Butin the back on my headI do believe that Man was not the 1st mathematician and physicist in this universe….
No answer was given to the corresponding question about mathematics.
For example, the law of non-contradiction with its refinements due to the intuitionists and the paraconsistent theoriesor more exactly that which corresponds to the law in model theoretic terms, the law is the theory, but the model is what we are asking about here, seems to be observer independent unless you practice Zen, I guess. Hence a question about physical reality does not address the question about a mathematical Platonism.
I would be interested in an answer that left out references to deities to this question.
John Faupel March 16, at 7: All laws — whether they be platonic, mathematical, physical, legal or moral, are our consciously constructed descriptions of reality, so exist only in our minds.
They may seem to approximate to reality but their degree of approximations is a measure of the poverty of our minds. Yoron April 18, at 9: If we assume that no logic exist we get a magical universe. What we have found so far is logics, not the absence of it. David Reid April 18, at 1: But for logic, thankfully the definition of existence is much more precise: This is not just a formalist definition; a Platonist would agree.
Revisiting Feynman on physical law : A view From the Bridge
So most logicians are somewhere in the middle. Yoron April 19, at Mathematics is, in a way, a subset of ones logic, meaning that I do not expect there to be able to exist a logic, unable to be expressed mathematically.
We search for, sometimes even have to invent new forms derivations of mathematics, to be able to describe them. David Reid April 19, at Essentially, Mathematical Logic sometimes called Symbolic Logic is the study of any formal system which contains an alphabet, a syntax, and rules of implication.
A logic is one of those systems.