Stop Avoiding The Post-Mortem: It's All Down To 3 Simple Questions | HuffPost Canada
The relationship between early post-mortem pH and the tenderisation of beef Fast glycolysing LD muscles were rated more tender in sensory analysis and. Transforming bonds: ritualising post-mortem relationships in the . seek a sense of meaning in the face of losing a significant other (Arnason. Dear Carolyn: How important is it for me to express my thoughts and feelings about the end of our relationship to my ex? I dated this wonderful.
For comparison, we also analyzed urine from 95 living persons, including 40 males and 55 females, aged from with a median of 25 years; these subjects had blood and urine samples taken for toxicological analysis as part of criminal investigations violence and rape.
Postmortem Urinary Cortisol Levels in Relation to the Cause of Death
The postmortem cases were subdivided by cause of death into the following subgroups: The miscellaneous subgroup included deaths of unknown cause, and causes of death observed for only one person. This grouping follows that of Zhu et al. Urine samples were analyzed for cortisol as recently described by Lang et al. The cortisol results were normalized in relation to the creatinine concentration in urine measured by a Reflotron Plus analyzer Roche Diagnostics Systems, Basel, Switzerland.
Nonparametric statistical methods were used for descriptions of data and for testing group differences Mann-Whitney for two groups and Kruskall-Wallis for multiple groups. Results Urinary cortisol levels ranged from 0. For the living subjects, the range extended from 1. Both distributions were skewed to the right with a few high values Figure 1. The medians were not significantly different Mann-Whitney test ; however, the upper limit of cortisol values in dead subjects was over ten times higher than that of living persons.
There were no significant differences between the genders of the groups. Cortisol levels of living persons versus dead persons. In general, there were large overlaps between the subgroups, and the medians ranged from 4.
The infection subgroup consisted of five cases with pneumonia and one with tuberculosis.
In the ketoacidosis subgroup, five cases were related to alcoholism and nine cases were of the diabetic type. The poisoning subgroup was the largest including 83 cases, 62 of which were caused by methadone, morphine, or a combination of several drugs. Although the median cortisol level in the poisoning subgroup The subgroup of cardiac-related deaths was similarly heterogeneous. Dividing the subgroup into acute versus non-acute cardiac-related deaths, showed 18 acute cases with a median of However, the medians were not significantly different.
There were no cases of suspected adrenocortical diseases. Cortisol levels according to cause of death. The strategy and plan has been written.
The financial and human resources needed for the project have been determined.
You know what you are doing and why you are doing it. You have established measurable criteria that will determine if you were successful. Matrixed teams of experts and contributors have been brought onto the project for collaboration, information sharing and seeking solutions along the way.
The timeline is set.
Approvals have been obtained. Everything that you thought should and could be done is done. The project is a go and the execution is completed. It is time for the post-mortem. You can find all kinds of post-mortem processes and documentation online and yes, I've been in post-mortem meetings that have taken hours.
I believe, however, that if you've done all of the upfront work correctly -- determining objectives and the success matrixes and values of success in the original strategic plan -- you really only need to deliver answers to three questions in your report.
What worked that you'd absolutely do again without change? What didn't work that you would never do again?
Postmortem Urinary Cortisol Levels in Relation to the Cause of Death | OMICS International
What worked but you would do again, but differently? Answers to these questions will be different depending on the perspective of the person answering. Your client will have one perspective, your team another. The collaborators, vendors and suppliers will also have an opinion.
Consider getting opinions from a select and varied group of those who touched the activity of project internally and externally. You can ask the questions and gather the information through e-mail, in a formal meeting, by survey, or a series of one-on-one conversations. Remember to explain why you value the opinion and how it will help, then outline the activity and share the original objectives and measures of success, along with any other information that you need to set the stage.
Then, ask your stakeholders to answer the three questions.
By acquiring a broad view of perspectives you should start seeing trends, duplicate answers and emerging issues that can absolutely help you be better next time.